<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Under Pennsylvania Law Anti Modification Provision of Section 1322(b)(2) Does Not Prevent Mortgage Modification Where Mortgagee&#8217;s Security Interest in Mobile Home Was Additional Collateral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gillmanandgillman.com/4-recent-decisions/under-pennsylvania-law-anti-modification-provision-of-section-1322b2-does-not-prevent-mortgage-modification-where-mortgagees-security-interest-in-mobile-home-was-additional-collateral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gillmanandgillman.com/4-recent-decisions/under-pennsylvania-law-anti-modification-provision-of-section-1322b2-does-not-prevent-mortgage-modification-where-mortgagees-security-interest-in-mobile-home-was-additional-collateral/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

